PENERAPAN PRINSIP ETIKA LINGKUNGAN PADA TEKNOLOGI REKAYASA GENETIK TANAMAN DAN REGULASI KEAMANAN PRODUK REKAYASA GENETIKA
Abstract
Biotechnology activities related to genetic engineering in plants are currently developing rapidly. This is done to overcome several problems related to improving the quality of food crops as well as various obstacles encountered during crop cultivation. However, along with the development of transgenic plants, various environmental issues due to genetic engineering technology in plants have emerged. The perpetrators of genetic engineering technology development must of course continue to apply environmental ethics so that cases related to the development of genetic engineering products do not occur. Therefore, efforts are needed to apply environmental ethical principles to genetic engineering technology. Several principles of environmental ethics include (1) respect for nature; (2) The principle of moral responsibility (moral responsibility for nature); (3) cosmic solidarity; (4) compassion and concern for nature (caring for nature); (5) The principle of not causing damage (no harm principle); (6) Living simply and in harmony with nature; (7) The principle of justice; (8) The principle of democracy; (9) The principle of moral integrity. In addition to upholding the ethical principles of the environment, government regulations regarding the safety regulations for genetically engineered products must still be complied with in order to avoid the risk of negatively impacting these engineered products.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Delaney, B. 2015. Safety assessment of foods from genetically modified crops in countries with developing economies. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 86 (1) :132-143.
Dianniar, U. 2014. ‘Tanaman Transgenik, Solusi atau Polusi?’. Dinas Pangan, Pertanian, dan Perikanan Kota Pontianak. https://pertanian.pontianakkota.go.id/artikel/23-tanaman-transgenik-solusi-atau-polusi.
Djaelani, M. S. 2011. Etika lingkungan dalam pembangunan berkelanjutan. Jurnal Ilmiah Econosains, 9(1), 21-27.
Estiati, A & M. Herman. 2015. Regulasi keamanan hayati produk rekayasa genetik di Indonesia. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian. 13 (2) : 129-146.
Hansen, L. dan Obrycki. 1999. Non-target Effects of Bt Corn Pollen on the Monarch Butterfly (Lepidoptera: Danaidae), Iowa State University.
Haryanti, Leni, ‘Dampak Bioteknologi’, http://leni-haryanti.blogspot.com/2012/05/makalah-dampak-bioteknologi.
Keraf SA. 2002. Etika Lingkungan. Jakarta (ID): Kompas.
Karmana, I. W. 2009. Adopsi Tanaman Transgenik dan Beberapa Aspek Perkembangannya, GaneC Swara 3(2): 12-21.
Losey, J.E., Rayor, L.S. & Carter, M.E. 1999. Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae. Nature, 399, 214.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2005 tentang Keamanan Hayati Produk Rekayasa Genetik. 2005. Jakarta: Kementerian Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.
Santosa, Dwi Andreas. 2000. Analisis Resiko Lingkungan Tanaman Transgenik. Jurnal Ilmu Tanah dan Lingkungan 3(2):32-36.
Sugianto, S. (2017). Kajian Bioetika Tanaman Transgenik. Mangifera Edu, 1(2), 25-34.
Suryanegara, I. W. 2011. Optimisme dan Pesimisme Rekayasa Genetika. http://wayansuryanegara.blogspot.com/2011/12/optimisme-dan-pesimimsi-rekayasa.
Syahza, A. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian. UR Press. https://almasdi.staff.unri.ac.id/ files/2020/09/Buku-METOPEL-2018.pdfSyamsi, Ana Ainul, ‘Sudah Mengenal GMO? (Bagian 2)’, http://blog.khalifamart.com/sudah-mengenal-gmo-bagian-2/, diakses 6 Oktober 2014.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 18 Tahun 2012 tentang Pangan. 2012. Jakarta: Kementerian Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2004 tentang Pengesahan Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity. 2004. Jakarta: Kementerian Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52364/senpling.v1i1.3
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
